UMI/ProQuest URL

 

http://80-wwwlib.umi.com/dissertations/fullcit/9710870

PUBLICATION NUMBER

 

AAT 9710870

TITLE

 

Intracultural differences: A differentiation culture study

AUTHOR

 

Moran, Mary Jo

DEGREE

 

PhD

SCHOOL

 

FIELDING GRADUATE INSTITUTE

DATE

 

1996

PAGES

 

285

ADVISER

 

Craig, Argentine Saunders

ISBN

 

0-591-18356-0

SOURCE

 

DAI-A 57/11, p. 4822

SUBJECT

 

BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, MANAGEMENT (0454); SOCIOLOGY, ETHNIC AND RACIAL STUDIES (0631); PSYCHOLOGY, INDUSTRIAL (0624)

 

ABSTRACT

 

This ethnographic case study examined the organizational culture of the Corda Institute, a pseudonym for a nonprofit, nonsectarian health and human service organization in the Midwest. Research questions included: If organizations are multi-cultural, around what differences do subcultures form? What kind of subcultures emerge? How do subcultures interact with the dominant culture in an organization? The research questions were answered through a content analysis of data collected from field notes, artifacts, archival data, and interviews. Participants included many of Corda Institute's 449 employees in 1 of its 3 major divisions or its administrative and support staff. The results of this study indicated that Corda Institute is a multicultural organization, i.e., a number of different subcultures coexisting within a single organization. Three types of subcultures were identified around the 4 core cultural themes of collaboration, diversity, mission, and ongoing education. These subcultures include a functional/occupational subculture, the upper management subculture, and 4 enhancing subcultures--1 dealing with collaboration, diversity, mission and ongoing education. The first 2 subcultures actually form around difference resulting from function. The enhancing subcultures took shape around intensity or magnitude rather than an outright difference. With respect to interaction between the dominant culture and the identified subcultures, all 6 subcultures, as well as the dominant culture, utilize pluralism/acculturation as their process for acculturation, i.e., 'the ways in which two groups adapt to each other and resolve emergent conflict' (Nahavandi & Malekzadeh, 1988, p. 82). The results of the study were explained in terms of the theory of organizational subcultures (Trice, 1993; Trice & Morand, 1991; Louis, 1985, 1990; Gregory, 1983; Cox, 1993; Sproull, 1981; Van Maanen and Barley, 1985; Bloor and Dawson, 1994) and acculturation models (Trice, 1993; Nahavandi & Malekzadeh, 1988; Cox, 1993; Simons, Vazquez, & Harris, 1993).